As Kobe and the gang put the finishing touches on their astounding 4-1 series victory over the defending champion San Antonio Spurs, I began to wonder "Could Detroit or Boston really beat L.A.?"
Watching the Celtics wrap up their series against the Pistons in six made me realize: No. They can't. As much as I respect Boston's accomplishments this season, I can't help but think they're going to fall short in the finals. The reason?
The Lakers' role players. They're simply better than what Boston can offer. Compating top three to top three, Kobe beats Paul Pierce easily, Pau Gasol and Kevin Garnett are comparable in how they contribute to their team (KG's got the edge on defense), and Lamar Odom versus Ray Allen is a win for Odom judging from recent performances. Allen's shot has been spotty in the playoffs. He had solid games five and six, but 3-10 and 2-8 nights won't get it done against the Lakers. Odom doesn't always have to put up points, he rebounds and assists well, and is a constant match-up problem off the dribble.
The rest of the Lakers almost handily beats the Celtics role players. Derek Fisher's more reliable than Rajon Rondo. Jordan Farmar gives you quality minutes off the bench, while Sam Cassel can't find the rim. Sasha Vujacic and Luke Walton are worth loads more than James Posey and Eddie house. The only Celtic who wins out is Kendrick Perkins over Ronny Turiaf. However, that's a starter over a bench player. Starters should generally win out, because they get the minutes. The Lakers are even deeper, I didn't even find decent comparisons for Trevor Ariza and Vladmir Radmanovic (who is easily the Lakers' weakest starter).
The better players win. So will the Lakers.
Keywords: Boston Celtics, Kobe Bryant, Los Angeles Lakers, NBA
