<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.nflfootballonline.com"?>

<rss version='2.0'   xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/'>
    <channel xml:base='http://www.nflfootballonline.com/katrussell/weblog/'>
        <title><![CDATA[katrussell Blog Posts]]></title>
        <description><![CDATA[katrussell blog posts from http://www.nflfootballonline.com/katrussell/weblog/]]></description>
        <link>http://www.nflfootballonline.com/katrussell/weblog/</link>	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[In Defense of the Saints Defense]]></title>
		<link>http://www.nflfootballonline.com/katrussell/weblog/8537/in-defense-of-the-saints-defense.html</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nflfootballonline.com/katrussell/weblog/8537/in-defense-of-the-saints-defense.html</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:06:46 PDT</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Saints Defensive Coordinator Gregg Williams received the game ball from New Orleans' 27-7 win Sunday, reportedly to a roar from the team's locker room in Buffalo's Ralph Wilson Stadium that could be heard several rooms away.&nbsp; Hopefully Williams smiled upon thinking about the thousand and one sports critics who said &quot;sure the Saints can score points, but their DEFENSE sucks.&quot;&nbsp; The NFL, and really all sports teams with the exception of Notre Dame and the Yankees and their ilk, exist on a Show Me First basis.&nbsp; Notre Dame looks like they might not be horrible this year, and Lou Holtz says he wouldn't be surprised to see them play for the national championship.&nbsp; The Yankees sign another $10 million-plus bat or arm, and they can't be beaten. You know other teams like that. But many teams have to prove a point over and over to replace the popular misconception of them.&nbsp; Just the other day someone told me that the Ravens couldn't keep their current success going because &quot;they're a defensive team, and their defensive numbers have dropped.&quot;&nbsp; Like my jaw. Sure, historically the Ravens have been a defensive team,&nbsp;but the team is only 13 years old. And no matter how old a team is, its focuses and strong/weak points can change.&nbsp; I'd assume they'd have to in order to stay relevant in the modern NFL (how you doing back there,&nbsp;Cleveland?).&nbsp; Truth be told, it looks like the Ravens have compensated beautifully on the offensive side for the defensive decline.&nbsp; &quot;Historic&quot; Ravens football? &nbsp;No.&nbsp;Winning football? Yes.&nbsp;No team has ever stayed good by doing the same thing over and over with no change.&nbsp; Want proof?&nbsp; The Oakland Raiders.</p><p><a href="http://www.nflfootballonline.com/katrussell/weblog/8537/in-defense-of-the-saints-defense.html">Continue reading "In Defense of the Saints Defense"</a></p>]]></description>
	</item>

    </channel>
</rss>
